Collaboration · Updated 2026-11-04

Best Time Tracking Software

Compare Clockify, Toggl Track, Harvest, Timely and Hubstaff for project time records, client billing and team oversight, with dated free-plan limits, official sources and a practical selection guide.

Elena Marsh, Head of ResearchElena MarshHead of ResearchReviewed 2026-11-04
Shortlist spotlight

Clockify

Project time tracking with a free starting point.

From Free plan; paid upgrades · Best for Teams starting with project timesheets

Which software fits your workflow?

  • 01Start with client billing, project planning or workforce time records: these need different workflows.
  • 02Clockify's current free-plan documentation lists up to 5 users; Harvest's free plan lists 1 seat and 2 projects.
  • 03Timely offers a 14-day trial rather than an ongoing free plan in the checked documentation.
  • 04Automatic capture and employee monitoring are different capabilities; examine privacy settings before enabling either.
  • 05No numerical scores are assigned: recommendations compare vendor documentation, not measured performance.
5

Tools compared

5 users

Clockify free limit

2 projects

Harvest free limit

14 days

Timely trial

Comparison criteria

01Time capture and correction
02Client billing and exports
03Timesheet approvals and reporting
04Privacy and employee access
05Plan limits and total cost
The software shortlist
01

Clockify

Project time tracking with a free starting point.

Clockify documents unlimited time tracking and projects for up to 5 users on its free plan. This is a dated limit, not the older unlimited-user claim that still appears in some comparisons. Its paid tiers add capabilities such as billable rates, invoicing and approvals. Choose a trial project and verify the tier needed for your reporting and approval chain before rolling it out to the whole team.

Pros

  • + Free tracking and projects within the documented user limit
  • + Apps, integrations and API listed in vendor documentation
  • + Paid workflow upgrades available

Cons

  • — Free access does not include every billing or management feature
  • — Growing teams must verify the current user allowance
Best for
Teams starting with project timesheets
Price from
Free plan; paid upgrades
Source: Official vendor plan documentation; checked 4 November 2026
02

Toggl Track

Focused timers and reporting for project work.

Toggl Track documents manual and real-time timers, calendar integrations and simple planning. Paid features include billable rates, team reporting and approvals. We do not print a numeric free-user limit or paid amount because the current pricing and support extracts did not establish consistent terms. Its place here is based on tracking workflow fit, not a claim that it is faster or more accurate than another tool.

Pros

  • + Manual and real-time tracking options
  • + Calendar integrations
  • + Paid reporting and approval options

Cons

  • — Verify free-user allowance directly
  • — Billing and management capabilities depend on plan
Best for
Individuals and teams wanting intentional time records
Price from
Free plan; confirm paid terms
Source: Official vendor plan documentation; checked 4 November 2026
03

Harvest

Time, expenses and invoicing in a connected workflow.

Harvest's pricing page lists a free plan for 1 seat and 2 projects. Time and expense records connect with invoicing, while paid plans expand reporting and integrations. Its support documentation explains usage-based billing, so a published base seat rate is not necessarily the final bill. Review the complete pricing explanation alongside a sample invoice export rather than comparing a single headline price.

Pros

  • + Time and expense tracking
  • + Invoicing workflow
  • + Clearly documented small free tier

Cons

  • — Free plan is limited to 1 seat and 2 projects
  • — Usage-based charges require a fuller cost check
Best for
Client-service businesses reviewing billable work
Price from
Free: 1 seat, 2 projects
Source: Official vendor plan documentation; checked 4 November 2026
04

Timely

Automatic capture for reconstructing project time.

Timely describes automatic tracking and AI-assisted categorisation alongside project-health and billable-time reporting. The checked pricing page offers a 14-day trial; the Starter tier lists 20 projects and a maximum of 5 users. These are plan allowances, not accuracy statistics. Test how people review and assign captured activity, and inspect the visibility and retention settings before collecting real employee data.

Pros

  • + Automatic tracking and categorisation
  • + Project and billable-time reporting
  • + Trial for evaluating the workflow

Cons

  • — No ongoing free tier documented in checked sources
  • — Starter project and user limits may constrain rollout
Best for
Teams prioritising automatic timesheet reconstruction
Price from
14-day trial; subscription required
Source: Official vendor plan documentation; checked 4 November 2026
05

Hubstaff

Workforce-oriented tracking with monitoring options.

Hubstaff documents time tracking, timesheets, activity levels and plan-dependent reporting. Its feature guide also describes screenshots and app or URL tracking. Those options call for a deliberate privacy policy; monitoring should not be confused with a proof of productivity. A 14-day trial is documented, while a permanent free plan was not confirmed. Verify seat minimums and add-ons before calculating a team subscription.

Pros

  • + Timesheets and workforce-focused features
  • + Reporting and budget options by plan
  • + Documented trial

Cons

  • — Monitoring requires careful policy and access decisions
  • — Check minimum seats and add-on costs
Best for
Teams needing a documented workforce tracking process
Price from
14-day trial; check subscription
Source: Official vendor plan documentation; checked 4 November 2026
Side by side
#ProductBest forPrice from
01ClockifyTeams starting with project timesheetsFree plan; paid upgrades
02Toggl TrackIndividuals and teams wanting intentional time recordsFree plan; confirm paid terms
03HarvestClient-service businesses reviewing billable workFree: 1 seat, 2 projects
04TimelyTeams prioritising automatic timesheet reconstruction14-day trial; subscription required
05HubstaffTeams needing a documented workforce tracking process14-day trial; check subscription
The full guide
01

How to choose the best time tracking software

The best time tracking software depends on the decision the records need to support. A freelancer may need an accurate invoice; an agency needs project profitability; a service business may need approved timesheets for payroll. These are related workflows, but they do not require the same data or the same level of employee monitoring. Begin with the output you need, then work backwards to the minimum information necessary to produce it.

Separate time tracking from attendance and surveillance. Logging a project timer does not automatically establish a payroll-compliant attendance record, and a screenshot does not prove productive work. Before comparing features, write down who will record time, who can edit it, who approves it and which system receives the approved result. A simple tool with a dependable handoff can be more useful than a complex platform that duplicates your accounting system.

Our shortlist compares published vendor information rather than laboratory performance or hands-on test results. The order is editorial, not a numerical quality ranking. Use the five comparison criteria above as a starting point, then try your own workflow before committing. Vendor documentation substantiates advertised capabilities; it does not establish how well those capabilities will work for your particular team.

02

Manual timers versus automatic time capture

A manual timer asks people to select a project and start or stop tracking. This can keep records intentional and easy to explain, but forgotten timers create gaps or overstated sessions. An automatic capture tool can build a private activity history that people use to reconstruct their day. That history is not necessarily a timesheet: someone still needs to decide what belongs to which client and what is billable.

Compare the correction process rather than simply counting automation features. Can a person split an entry between projects, merge duplicate records and add a reason for an adjustment? Can a manager see that an approved entry changed? Test a day with interruptions, overlapping meetings and work away from the computer. The winner is the tool that produces a trustworthy record with a reasonable amount of administration, not the one that captures the most activity.

03

Example: building a billable client timesheet

Consider an illustrative design studio with two clients, not a measured customer case study. The studio sets up a separate project for each client and uses tasks such as research, design and revisions. A team member records a work session, marks the appropriate entries billable and adds a short description. The project lead reviews the descriptions and checks that internal administration has not been charged to the client.

Next, the studio exports the approved entries and checks whether its invoicing system receives hours, rates, project codes and tax treatment correctly. A timesheet tool might export a useful report without creating an accounting invoice. Another might offer integrated invoicing but still require review before sending. Run this complete chain in your trial; an attractive dashboard does not compensate for a broken invoice handoff.

For fixed-fee projects, the same records can support an internal budget comparison without appearing on the customer's invoice. Keep those purposes distinct. Estimated effort, recorded hours and financial margin are different quantities, particularly when contractors, expenses or blended rates are involved. Confirm the report answers the business question rather than treating all recorded time as earned revenue.

04

How to run a time tracking software trial

Step 1: choose a real project and document its billing rules before configuring the trial. Step 2: create representative tasks, billable flags and member permissions. Step 3: ask participants to record normal work using the devices they actually use, including mobile work where relevant. Step 4: deliberately correct a forgotten timer and check whether the change is understandable to a reviewer.

Step 5: complete the approval and export process. Check the resulting file against your payroll or accounting requirements rather than assuming any CSV will work. Step 6: remove a trial user and inspect what happens to their historical records. Finally, export the project and confirm that the organisation can retain its records after ending the subscription. These are suggested evaluation steps, not claims that Statfield performed them.

05

Privacy, consent and employee access

Where a product offers screenshots, app activity or location features, define a clear purpose before enabling them. Establish which settings are optional, what workers can see, who has access and how long information is retained. Check local employment and privacy requirements with an appropriate adviser. Product availability is not a legal justification for collecting more data than the business needs.

Ask vendors about data export, account deletion, retention, processing locations and contractual terms. A claim of encryption does not explain whether a manager can read individual activity or whether an external integration receives it. Keep project time records separate from unnecessary personal detail, and make the organisation's policy understandable before introducing a tool. These considerations may outweigh a small difference in subscription cost.

06

Pricing: compare the actual workflow, not a headline rate

Time tracking subscriptions can charge for people, include different levels of reporting or restrict approval and management features to paid tiers. A free timer is not automatically a free payroll workflow. Check the plan that includes your required features and establish whether inactive users, contractors or managers need paid seats. Compare the same billing term and currency across your shortlist.

We link official plans instead of printing uncertain subscription amounts. Budget onboarding, administration and integration work as well as the subscription. If you already use project management or accounting software, examine its existing time features first. A separate product is worthwhile when it improves record quality or reduces a concrete workload; adding another system merely to collect overlapping data can make the process worse.

07

When to select each type of time tracker

Clockify belongs on a shortlist for teams that want straightforward project time records and a free starting point. Toggl Track is a candidate for a focused tracking and reporting workflow. Harvest is worth examining when billable work and invoicing belong together. Timely is relevant when reconstructing work through automatic capture is the central requirement. Hubstaff merits consideration where workforce-oriented tracking is needed, with a careful privacy review.

These are use-case recommendations based on each vendor's published positioning, not a guarantee that every required feature is included in an entry plan. Verify the relevant source, document your non-negotiable requirements and complete a representative trial. When two tools both meet the requirements, the less disruptive option may be preferable to a platform with more capabilities that nobody will use.

Before you buy

  1. 01Define the output: invoice, project report or payroll handoff.
  2. 02Confirm the exact user and project allowances.
  3. 03Try a forgotten timer and a corrected entry.
  4. 04Complete approval and export in the trial.
  5. 05Review monitoring, visibility and retention settings.
  6. 06Confirm all subscription and usage charges.
Terms used above
Billable time
Recorded work eligible to be charged under the client's agreement.
Automatic capture
Activity records used to reconstruct time; not necessarily an approved timesheet.
Timesheet approval
A review step before time records are used for billing, payroll or reporting.
FAQ

What is the best free time tracking software?

Clockify and Toggl Track both document free plans, while Harvest lists a free tier for 1 seat and 2 projects. Clockify's checked free documentation lists up to 5 users. Choose according to your required exports and workflow; free does not imply all paid billing features are included.

Does Timely have a free plan?

The checked Timely documentation offers a 14-day trial and describes subscribing afterwards. An ongoing free plan was not documented.

Is time tracking the same as employee monitoring?

No. Project time entries can be recorded without screenshots or app activity. Monitoring options need separate privacy, access and retention decisions.

Were these tools tested by Statfield?

No. This comparison is based on official vendor documentation. The suggested trial steps are exercises for readers, not completed Statfield tests.

Sources

Official vendor information checked 4 November 2026. Monetary prices are omitted where billing terms or current amounts could not be reliably confirmed. Free-plan limits can change. Read the linked source before subscribing. This is a documentation-based comparison, not hands-on testing.

Keep reading

Related statistics briefs

Related product rankings

Other rankings

This shortlist compares published vendor information, not hands-on test results. Order is editorial and is not a measured performance ranking. Verify plan details with each vendor before buying.